OPENING OUR EYES

          Kelly Smaltz


          We are brought up thinking that everyone shares our views and
          that they are correct and the only right way of seeing things. In
          Flatland, a novel by Edwin A. Abbott, two men from different
          dimensions argue about which one of their societies is right and
          more superior. They accomplish nothing because each is so closed-
          minded to the fact that what they have known all their lives may
          be wrong. This is the case when it comes to homosexuality in
          today's world or anything that involves looking, acting, and
          thinking differently than us.

              A. Square and the Monarch of Lineland are closed-minded to
          the possibility ofthere being other worlds or multiple ways to
          seeing things different from their own. Outside Lineland all was
          nonexistent according to the Monarch. When A. Square tried to
          explain to him that the universe was made up of more than just
          straight lines and points, the Monarch called these suggestions
          "impossible" and "inconceivable" (P. 46). A. Square shared his
          ideas with the Monarch because in his words he had "to open up to
          him some glimpses of the truth" (P. 47). Neither man could begin
          to accept the possibility that his world and his beliefs could
	  be in any way inferior to those ofthe other. Yet the two men
	  state their case for what seemed to be a long while.  During the
	  course ofthe conversation,
          the Monarch called the Square and his ideas "uneducated,"
          "irrational," and "audacious" (P. 51). The Monarch thinks if A.
          Square "had a particle of sense, [he] would listen to reason" (P.
          51). Upon listening to the opinion that Flatland is lacking so
          much as compared to Lineland, A. Square strikes back, saying,
          "you think yourself the perfection of existence, while you are in
          reality the most imperfect and imbecile" (P. 5I). A. Square
          continues, claiming, "I am the completion of your incomplete
          self" (P. 51). Neither the Monarch nor A. Square could be swayed
          to the other one's way of thinking. They each thought his way was 
	  the right and only way.

              As with A. Square and the Monarch, some people are closed to
          the idea of people viewing things differently than what they
          believe. They sometimes classify them as weird, but who is to say
          what is right or what is wrong? I certainly would not want to be
          told that what I like, I could not enjoy anymore because someone
          decided it was wrong. Thousands of people who have come out and
          shared with the world that they are different have been treated
          as outcasts. These people are homosexuals. Just because they live
          differently than the majority of the people in the world do, this
          does not necessarily make them bad. They are faced with their own
          kind of 'racism' every day.

              Children are brought up to share many of their parent's
          values and opinions, just as A. Square's sons, the pentagons,
          did. How else would they learn to hate people only because they
          are different? When I was in ninth grade a new boy came to our
          school. From the start he made it known that he was gay. I saw
          the way the students acted toward him, especially the boys. They
          thought that if they hung out with him or even talked to him,
          everyone would think they were gay too. They did not want to be
          treated the same way they treated him. After seeing this I
          reached my own conclusions about why some people cannot accept
          someone who is gay. They think if they are seen with someone 
          who is gay, people will think they are gay as well. 
	  To me this means they are
          not comfortable with their sexuality. If they were, they would
          not worry about people thinking that they were something that
          they were not. The blame cannot be placed solely on these people,
          because the people stereotyping them are wrong too. However, the
          ones being stereotyped will in some cases turn around and do the
          very thing they were afraid would be done to them.

              My interest in this topic stems from when, at ten years old,
          I found out my uncle was not only gay, but dying of AIDS. For
          some members of my family it was difficult to put aside their
          ways of thinking and accept him. I did not fully understand what
          everything meant, but gradually I learned over time. I knew
          someone who was gay and had AIDS and he was not a bad person at
          all. In fact he was a loving and giving person. To think that
          some people would classify him as bad was totally beyond me.

              He knew the stereotypes that existed and that is why nobody
          in our family knew his situation until he was very sick. By this
          point, he had alienated himself so much from the rest ofthe
          family that it was almost to the point where he was a stranger to
          them. He still came to visit on holidays, but he always seemed
          out of reach, as ifthere was something wrong-- but no one knew
          what. When the family found out about him, some ofthem could
          handle the news while some could not. His sister for instance,
          closed him off and did not let him come to her house. She was
          afraid of him. But, why? He was the same person he had always
          been, her brother. The only difference was that he needed her and
          the rest ofthe family then, more than ever. He did not need 
	  to be pushed away. Can anyone imagine how frightened he 
	  must have been? Why could she not put aside her own 
	  prejudices and open herself up to him and
          his situation? She had grown up with him. Did she really think he
          would be so inconsiderate as to put her and her children at risk?
          She was brought up that the Bible declares the right and wrong
          way to do everything. Along with millions of other people, she
          would say, if God had intended us to be attracted to people of
          our own sex he would not have made the first humans a male and a
          female. Does it not say in the Bible, however, that God loves
          everyone? It is a part oflife that we are not all alike, but we
          learn to live with everyone's differences.

              Just as A. Square felt about the Monarch, I feel that someone
          needed "to open up some glimpses ofthe truth" to my aunt. I did
          not personally see how my aunt treated my uncle because I was to
          young. I only know what my parents tell me, but ifI had been a
          little older and had known then what I know now, I would not have
          been able to just stand around and watch her treat him like that.
          I get mad even now when I think about it. I do know that today my
          aunt regrets treating him like that, but she is paying the price
          now. There was only a little precious time left for her to spend
          with him and she wasted it. My uncle's situation did not change
          the way she feels, however. The Bible is still always right and
          her view, that being gay is a sin, still stands. Just as A.
          Square and the Monarch needed to open their eyes to new
          dimensions, many of the people in the world need to open their
          eyes to different ways of living. These differences, especially
          in the case of homosexuality, do not change the person inside the
          body. We need to step outside the guidelines that our society
          says are acceptable and not acceptable and those that were set up
          by our parents and family members and learn to form our own
          opinions not based on beliefs or appearances, but what lies
          within.
          


Return to list of papers

Rev 12/96